- Parallel or bootcamp for mac install#
- Parallel or bootcamp for mac generator#
- Parallel or bootcamp for mac windows 10#
- Parallel or bootcamp for mac pro#
It's only an "experiment", as I don't have an real intention to use UltraScope I just want to see if I can get it to work since so much test equipment software (like software for arbitrary waveform generators and power supplies) are not supported on macOS, I thought "maybe" Parallels could be an option to get this Mac talking to various pieces of test gear especially since I plan to buy an arbitrary waveform generator (AWG) in the $100 USD price range from AliExpress vendors after the Lunar New Year holiday is over and the Chinese businesses are back to work.
Parallel or bootcamp for mac windows 10#
Earlier, I did not fully isolate them and had some problem connecting, so maybe if I isolate Windows 10 as much as possible from the Mac (an option in Parallels config) I can get RIGOL UltraScope to work. Later, I will try installing NI-VISA and UltraScope for the RIGOL DS1054Z and see if I can get it to connect to the oscope, by isolating Windows 10 completely from the Mac. It's running a bit better since I repartitioned the boot disk.
Parallel or bootcamp for mac pro#
Trying Parallels again on the 12-core Mac Pro running Catalina. If I *really* must have Windows for some test equipment applications, I may just go the "buy a cheap PC route", which is the same advice from many reviewers and commenters out there in "discuss and share" land. I tried adjusting various Parallels configuration switches and sliders in the control panels, rebooting a number of times, but I ended up just deleting Parallels off my Mac. īut I thought to myself, since I have 64GB of RAM and 12-cores (and am quite happy about the performance of this MacPro, 2013), maybe I'll have a different outcome.Īlas, I experienced the same very slow performance others talked about in reviews. Had read a number of reviews comparing Parallels to BootCamp (and other approaches) and the bottom line seemed to be "the performance is so slow you are better off to buy a cheap Windows PC.". I then installed all the prerequisites for the RIGOL software, including NI-VISA for Windows and the drivers, etc. The basic Parallels installation went fine and so I also installed Windows 10.
Parallel or bootcamp for mac install#
The reason for this install was to test some RIGOL test gear software which only runs on Windows. You may be forced by your project to use ESRI products.įeel free to PM me if you think there's anything which I can provide assistance.I just installed (and removed) Parallels Desktop 15 Edition on my MacPro (2013) with 64GB memory and 12-cores, which is running the latest version of macOS Catalina as of this post. With the death of Boot Camp and the switch to ARM M1 processors in the latest Macs, Parallels remains on the cutting edge of virtualization and is the best way to run Windows on both Intel and M1 Macs. I got ArcMap to work well enough to get me through several projects until I researched and found another solution that suited my work environment. Parallels 17 is definitely faster than ever due to a huge re-engineering effort for Big Sur, Monterey and M1 chips. My experience was years ago as far as tech specs go. Been strictly using QGIS for about 4-5 years now.Įither bite the bullet and get a Windows machine or prepare for rough seas ahead.Įdit: I guess I don't mean to sound so ominous.
Ummmmm, I ended up going to QGIS and using QGIS Cloud services to publish maps. With 32GB of RAM, still ran into memory errors when running processes. The MacBook had an early version 4k screen that kept bugging out in Windows. I seem to remember having to get the enterprise version of Parallels to get everything to work right. ArcPro may do something different there though. Not sure what license server you're using, or of it's a standalone license, but that was an issue too. I ran Parallels on a 2017 MacBook Pro with ArcMap 10.x.
0 kommentar(er)
